home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
022089
/
02208900.036
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-24
|
4KB
|
96 lines
<text id=89TT0498>
<title>
Feb. 20, 1989: America Abroad
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
Feb. 20, 1989 Betrayal:Marine Spy Scandal
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
WORLD, Page 45
America Abroad
</hdr><body>
<p>Trouble on the Home Front
</p>
<p>By Strobe Talbott
</p>
<p> The most frequently uttered five syllables in Washington
these days are "bipartisanship." That tender word is part of the
vocabulary of the honeymoon between a new Congress and a new
Administration, especially when the pillow talk turns to foreign
policy. It is meant to conjure up the happy image of Republicans
and Democrats hand in hand at the water's edge. Actually, the
word is doubly misleading, both in its evocation of the distant
past and in its implications for the near future.
</p>
<p> The brief heyday of bipartisanship was in the Truman years,
when a Democratic Administration enlisted the support of a
pre-World War II isolationist Republican, Senator Arthur
Vandenberg, in the postwar reconstruction of Europe. But
Vandenberg later joined in highly partisan attacks on the
Democrats for "losing" China and "letting" the Soviet Union
acquire the atom bomb.
</p>
<p> Nor has disagreement between the Republicans and Democrats
been the principal obstacle to effective foreign policy in
recent years. Rather, the source of poison and paralysis has
more often been ideologically motivated obstructionism within
each of the two parties.
</p>
<p> Jimmy Carter had far more difficulty with another Democrat,
the late Henry Jackson, than with most Republicans. Likewise,
Ronald Reagan's diplomatic appointees encountered more
opposition in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee from the
G.O.P.'s own Jesse Helms than from the soporifically temperate
senior Democrat, Claiborne Pell. In 1985 Helms held up the
confirmation of Reagan's Ambassador to China, Winston Lord, for
more than three months, preventing him from being at his post
when then Vice President George Bush visited Beijing.
</p>
<p> Lord's main sin was that he had served as a close aide to
Henry Kissinger, whom Helms Republicans and Jackson Democrats
will forever blame for detente and SALT. Now that is
bipartisanship.
</p>
<p> For nearly a decade, Bush has been suppressing and denying
his own centrist roots. In an interview with TIME on the eve of
his Inauguration, Bush was asked whether he was a moderate.
"No!" he snapped, reacting to the label as though it were a
synonym for wimp. He protests too much, out of fear of the
right. Helms & Co. sense that fear and mean to play on it.
</p>
<p> On the surface, Secretary of State James Baker's
confirmation hearings last month were a love feast. Helms
exuded courtesy, calling Baker "Secretary Jim." But the North
Carolina Senator and his allies used the occasion to declare
themselves on some potentially troublesome issues: Salvadoran
rightist Roberto D'Aubuisson may be an admirable patriot who has
got a bum rap for the death squads, and Winnie Mandela is a
terrorist.
</p>
<p> Meanwhile, Republican hard-liners have been sniping at the
appointments of a number of experienced middle-of-the-roaders,
particularly ones with Kissinger connections, such as Baker's
chosen deputy, Lawrence Eagleburger. Another target of
opposition has been Lord, whom Eagleburger wanted to be
Assistant Secretary for East Asia. And as a sop to the right, a
former Helms protege, Richard McCormack, got the job of Under
Secretary for Economic Affairs, instead of almost everyone's
first choice, Robert Hormats, a highly regarded international
trade specialist.
</p>
<p> Behind the talk of interparty cooperation, the lines are
being drawn for some nasty intraparty fights -- over personnel
now and policy later. The toughest test that Bush and Baker
face on the home front of their foreign policy will not be
whether they are able to sit down and compromise with the
Democrats but whether they are able to stand up to their fellow
Republicans.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>